Incorporando Datos de Cobertura
de la Tierra a la Herramienta
CAALU
Stephen M. Ogle, Ph.D.
Colorado State University
Natural Resources Ecology Laboratory
Fort Collins, Colorado USA
Reconocimientos:
Colaboradores: Dan Irwin (NASA), Jason Tullis (University of
Arkansas), y Jack Cothren (University of Arkansas)
Incorporando SIG/Datos de
Sensoriamento Remoto
Datos Espaciales de SIG:
Cobertura/Uso de la Tierra, Suelos y Clima
Resultados del
Inventario
Herramienta
de Inventario
CAALU
CARBON SEQUESTRATION RURAL APPRAISAL
CURRENT LAND USE INFORMATION FROM LOCAL KNOWLEDGE (SHEET A)
STATE
INDIANA
COUNTY
BLACKFORD
FOR INDICATED SOILS ON MAP DETERMINE:
MUID (STATSGO ASSOCIATION) IN004
IN005
LAND USE INFORMATION
TOTAL CROPLAND
72.9
90.7
IN029
IN032
74
83.4
CARBON
SEQUESTRATION RURAL APPRAISAL
CLASS I & II
CLASS III & IVGENERAL
LAND USE INFORMATION FROM LOCAL KNOWLEDGE (SHEET B)
CLASS V & VI
FOREST OR TREES STATE
GRASS LANDS
10.9
INDIANA
0.9
17.5
14
7.7
8.5
COUNTY
11.9
BLACKFORD
3.1
CARBON SEQUESTRATION RURAL APPRAISAL
0.6 THE COUNTY
0
1.7
ANY 0.1
PART OF
BEEN
DRAINED (YES/NO):
IF YES, ANSWER
THE FOLLOWING.
2
0.05
0GENERAL
0 LAND USE INFORMATION FROM LOCAL KNOWLEDGE (SHEET C)
WATER / WETLANDS
HAS
URBAN / OTHER
TOTAL
99.9%
100.0%
100.0%
100.1%
0.0%
0.0%
OPEN DITCH
DRAINAGE
STATE
INDIANA
TIME PERIOD OF
% OF SOIL
INSTALLATION
DRAINED
IS 10% OR MORE OF
ANY MUID
LANDSCAPE DESCRIPTION
MUID
FLAT
ROLLING HILLS
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
TILE DRAINAGE
BLACKFORD
TIME PERIOD
OFSEQUESTRATION
% OF SOIL RURAL APPRAISAL
CARBON
DRAINED
INSTALLATION
IRRIGATED (YES/NO):
COUNTY LEVEL FARMING AND CROPPING SYSTEM HISTORY FROM PRE 1900 TO PRESENT (SHEET D)
STEEP HILLS
IN004
FLOOD PLAIN
IN005
IF YES, ANSWER THE FOLLOWING.
STATE
MUID
IN029
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
INDIANA
COUNTY
TIME PERIOD OF
% OF SOIL
ANNUAL AMOUNT
INSTALLATIONTIME FRAME
IRRIGATED1970-1990+
APPLIED (INCHES)
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
BLACKFORD
TYPES OF SYSTEMS
ANNUAL CONSERVATION PRACTICES INSTALLED
IN004
PRACTICES INSTALLED
% ESTIMATE OF COUNTY BEING FARMED DURING THIS TIME FRAME:
85% BY COUNTY AND SOIL TYPE
IN032
TOTAL CROPLAND: % OF THIS SOIL IDENTIFIED AS CROPLAND . THE SUM OF LAND CAPABILITY CLASS I & II, III & IV, AND V & VI MUST ADD TO THIS %.
IN005
USE IN REPORTING TO DOE FOR CARBON SEQUESTRATION
CLASS I & II: % OF THIS SOIL THAT IS CLASS I & II CROPLAND.
(USE SEPARATE SHEET FOR EACH SOIL MUID)
CROP ROTATIONS (SPECIFY 1 TO 3)
CLASS III & IV: % OF THIS SOIL THAT IS CLASS III & IV CROPLAND.
IN029
CLASS V & VI: % OF THIS SOIL THAT IS CLASS V & VI CROPLAND.
FOREST OR TREES: % OF THIS SOIL IDENTIFIED AS FOREST OR TREES.
IN032
1)
CORN-SOYBEAN
STATE INDIANA
COUNTY
BLACKFORD
MUID
IN004
2)
GRASS LANDS: % OF THIS SOIL IDENTIFIED AS GRASS LANDS.
ACRES OF CONSERVATION PRACTICES INSTALLED (ACRES)
COMMON CROP ROTATION (s)
GRASS
TREE
CONVERSIONS PLANTING
3)
WATER / WETLANDS: % OF THIS SOIL IDENTIFIED AS WETLANDS.
URBAN / OTHER LANDS: % OF THIS SOIL IDENTIFIED AS OTHER LANDS INCLUDING URBAN LANDS, DEVELOPED LANDS, ABANDONED LANDS.
LANDSCAPE DESCRIPTION: % OF THIS SOIL IN EACH LANDSCAPE DESCRIPTION.
FOR INDICATED CROPS
CROP NAME
YIELD (BU OR TONS/AC)
CORN
REDUCED
TILLLAGE
SOYBEAN
130
40
NO-TILL
REDUCED
TILLLAGE
NO-TILL
WETLANDS
CREATED
AND/OR
RESTORED
1985
1986
N FERT APPLIED (LBS/AC)
110
1987
MANURE APPLIED (TONS/AC)
2
1988
MUID: SOIL MAP UNIT ID FROM STATSGO. (FROM MAP)
TYPICAL TILLAGE OPERATIONS
DISK
DISK
M UID: SOIL MAP UNIT ID FROM STATSGO. (FROM MAP)
TIME PERIOD OF INSTALLATION:TIM
GIVE
THE TIME PERIOD WHEN DRAINAGE PRACTICES
E PERIOD OF INSTALLATION: GIVE THE TIME PERIOD WHEN IRRIGATION PRACTICES
WERE INSTALLLED. (i.e.
1930-1950,
CULTIVATE
DISK
WERE INSTALLLED. (i.e. 1930-1950,
1940-1960,
1970-1990, ETC.)
1990,
ETC.)
PLANT
PLANT
1989
1990
1940-1960, 19701991
% OF SOIL
IRRIGATED:
GIVE AN
ESTIMATE
FOR THESE
OF THE
AMOUNT OF IRRIGATION INSTALLED.
% OF SOIL DRAINED: GIVE AN ESTIMATE
FOR
THESE SOILS
OF
THE AMOUNT
OF SOILS
DRIANAGE
INSTALLED.
1992
CULTIVATE
ANNUAL AM OUNT APPLIED (INCHES): GIVE AN ESTIMATE OF THE ANNUAL AMOUNTCULTIVATE
OF IRRIGATION WATER
APPLIED IN INCHES. (6 INCHES, 12
1993
INCHES, 15 INCHES, ETC.)
1994
TYPES OF SYSTEM S: TYPICAL TYPE OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM INSTALLED. (CENTER PIVOT, GATED PIPE, ETC.)
1995
Comments:
1996
1997
1998
TIM E FRAM E: PERIOD OF TIME A S SPECIFIED.
1999
% ESTIM ATE OF COUNTY BEING FARM ED DURING THIS TIM E FRAM E: GIV E A N ESTIMA TE OF THE COUNTY A REA BEING FA RMED
DURING THIS TIME FRA ME.
2000
TYPICAL CROP ROTATION: CROP ROTA TIONS INCLUDE (CORN-CORN; CORN-SOY BEA N; CORN-CORN-OA TS-MEA DOW-MEA DOW;
MUID: SOIL MAP UNIT ID FROM STATSGO. (FROM MAP)
CORN-SOY BEA N-CORN-OA TS-MEA DOW-MEA DOW; ETC)
CROPROTA
ROTATION:
PICK THE TWO MOST COMMON CROP ROTATIONS. IF ONE ROTATION IS >90% OF CROPPED ACRES,
FOR INDICATED CROPS: A CTUA L CROP INFORMA TION FOR THE INDICA TED CROPS IN THE
TIONS.
REPORT ONLY THAT ROTATION. TOTAL FOR THE COUNTY SHOULD EQUAL THE CTIC REPORTED VALUES FROM 1989 TO
CROP: CROP NA ME A S SHOWN IN CROP ROTA TION.
YIELD: CROP Y IELD IN BU/A C FOR GRA INS OR TONS/A C FOR HA Y .
PRESENT. SEE SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION.
REDUCED TILLAGE: REDUCED TILLAGE FARMING WHICH LEAVE GREATER THAN 15% RESIDUE AFTER PLANTING. (INCLUDES
N FERT APPLIED: ESTIMA TE OF COMMERCIA L NITROGEN FERTILIZER A PPLIED A NNUA LLY
(LBS/A
C). TILL BUT NOT NO-TILL).
MULCH
TILL, RIDGE
M ANURE APPLIED: ESTIMA TE OF MA NURE A PPLIED A NNUA LLY (TONS/A C), BY CROP.
NO-TILL: NO-TILL FARMING SYSTEM.
TYPICAL TILLAGE OPERATIONS: TY PICA L TILLA GE OPERA TIONS USED TO GROW THIS CROP. (EXA MPLES A RE FA LL PLOW;
GRASS CONVERSIONS: ALL GRASS PLANTING CONSERVATION PRACTICES.
SPRING PLOW; CHIESEL PLOW; DISK; HA RROW; CULTIV A TOR; DRILL; PLA NT; ETC.)
Factores de Emisión:
Factores Defecto de IPCC o Factores
Específicos de País
(WATERWAYS, BUFFERS INCLUDING RIPIARIAN BUFFERS, FILTER STRIPS, TERRACES, CRP).
USE 12' WIDTH FOR TERRACES (LF*12/43560=ACRE).
USE 40' WIDTH FOR ALL OTHER PRACTICES REPORTED IN LINEAR FEET (LF*40/43560=ACRE).
TREE PLANTING: ALL CONSERVATION PRACTICES THAT INCLUDE TREE PLANTINGS. (WINDBREAKS, SHELTERBELTS, AGROFORESTRY)
WETLANDS CREATED AND/OR RESTORED: ALL CONSERVATION PRACTICES THAT INCLUDE THE CREATION OR RESTORATION
OF WETLANDS.
Datos de Actividad de Manejo:
Estadísticas Nacionales
de Agricultura y Silvicultura
90
80
No-tillage
70
Conventional tillage
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
G
rif
fin
H
or
se Gr
sh iffin
oe
B
en
d
K
en
tu
ck
y
K
en
tu
W
c
k
.L
af y
ay
S
. C et
ha te
rle
st
o
H
oy n
te
vil
le
H
oy
te
vil
le
H
oy
te
vil
M
an le
ha
tta
W n
oo
st
er
W
oo
st
er
W
oo
st
er
W
oo
st
er
K
B
S
A
kr
on
S
id
ne
y
OTHER
TOTAL
0.0%
COUNTY
Datos Espaciales de SIG
• Clima
– Recomendase que sean usadas regiones
climáticas defecto de IPCC si los factores defecto
de emision vas a ser usados
• Suelo
– También recomendase que sean usadas clases de
suelo defecto de IPCC
• Uso de la Tierra
– Categorías de IPCC: Bosques, Cultivos, Praderas,
Asentamientos, Humedales y Otros Usos
• Subcategorías de Uso de la Tierra
– Tipos de bosques
– Tipos de praderas
– Tipos de cultivo
Importando Datos Espaciales de SIG a
la Herramienta de Inventario de GEI
• Exportando clima, suelo, uso de la tierra,
subcategorías de uso de la tierra (si hay), y datos de
area del SIG
• Salvar datos en un archivo texto
– Orden de las columnas: clima, suelo, uso de la tierra,
subcategorías de uso de la tierra (si hay), y area
– Titulos de columnas
– Separados por comas
• Importar a la herramienta usando la opcion “input
file” para entrada de datos de uso y manejo de la
tierra
Archivo de
Importacion:
Ejemplo
climate,soil,lutype,area
TRM,HAM,CRO,2919894.20
TRM,HAM,FOR,3359760.83
TRM,HAM,GRA,1041601.15
TRM,HAM,SET,3877.62
TRM,HAM,WET,143290.34
TRM,LAM,CRO,566015.12
TRM,LAM,FOR,2786199.48
TRM,LAM,GRA,92800.60
TRM,LAM,SET,3816.94
TRM,LAM,WET,73629.06
TRM,VOL,CRO,40697.90
TRM,VOL,FOR,127249.06
TRM,VOL,GRA,4463.06
TRM,VOL,WET,1821.44
TRM,WET,CRO,21314.42
TRM,WET,FOR,24314.44
TRM,WET,GRA,27586.35
TRM,WET,SET,315.95
TRM,WET,WET,7699.40
WTM,HAM,CRO,20028.59
WTM,HAM,FOR,75022.50
WTM,HAM,GRA,1685.64
WTM,LAM,CRO,3131.15
WTM,LAM,FOR,7102.60
WTM,LAM,GRA,159.96
WTM,LAM,WET,472.70
WTM,VOL,CRO,11870.78
WTM,VOL,FOR,49932.65
WTM,VOL,GRA,899.75
Descargar

Slide 1