The Kansas
Cancer
Partnership
Evaluation –
Fall 2009
KCP Evaluation:
• Partnership Self-Assessment Tool
– Baseline Survey- repeat every other
year
– Will allow for feedback from
individuals on the KCP
– Asks questions about different
aspects of the Partnership
Evaluation Results- Synergy:
* Identify new ways to solve problems
- Extremely well- 7.1% Very well- 53.6% Somewhat well- 37.5%
(98.2%)
* Include views and priorities
- Extremely well- 12.5% Very well- 57.1% Somewhat well- 23.2%
(92.8%)
* Develop goals supported by partners
- Extremely well- 23.2% Very well- 51.8% Somewhat well- 25.0%
(100%)
* Identify problems to address
- Extremely well- 14.3% Very well- 51.8% Somewhat well- 25.0%
(91.1%)
Evaluation Results- Synergy:
* Address needs and problems in community
- Extremely well- 7.1% Very well- 33.9% Somewhat well- 51.8%
(92.8%)
* Implement strategies that work in community
- Extremely well- 5.4% Very well- 33.9% Somewhat well- 55.4%
(94.7%)
* Obtain support from community
- Extremely well- 14.3% Very well- 26.8% Somewhat well- 48.2%
(89.3%)
* Comprehensive activities that connect services, programs and system
- Extremely well- 16.7% Very well- 40.7% Somewhat well- 37.0%
(94.4%)
* Partnership actions addressing problem important to community
- Extremely well- 8.9% Very well- 41.1% Somewhat well- 35.7%
(85.7%)
Evaluation Results-Leadership:
* Taking responsibility for Partnership
- Extremely well- 35.7% Very good- 37.5% Good- 17.9% (91.1%)
* Inspire or motivate people involved in the Partnership
- Excellent- 23.2% Very good- 46.4% Good- 17.9% (87.5%)
* Empower people involved in the Partnership
- Excellent- 19.6% Very good- 37.5% Good- 26.8% (83.9%)
* Communicating the vision within the Partnership
- Excellent- 25.0% Very good- 41.1% Good- 26.8% (92.9%)
* Common language within the Partnership
- Excellent- 14.3% Very good- 51.8% Good- 19.6% (85.7%)
* Foster respect, trust, inclusiveness and openness
- Excellent- 32.1% Very good- 39.3% Good- 14.3% (85.7%)
Evaluation Results-Leadership:
* Creating an environment where differences of opinion
can be voiced
- Excellent- 32.1% Very good- 35.7% Good- 16.1% (83.9%)
* Resolving conflict among partners
- Excellent- 21.4% Very good- 35.7% Good- 16.1% (73.2%)
* Combining perspectives, resources and skills of partners
- Excellent- 25.0% Very good- 37.5% Good- 21.4% (83.9%)
* Helping partnership be creative and look at things
differently
- Excellent- 18.2% Very good- 36.4% Good- 20.0% (74.6%)
* Recruiting diverse people and organizations to
Partnership
- Excellent- 14.3% Very good- 28.6% Good- 35.7% (78.6%)
Evaluation Results-Efficiency:
* Partnership uses partners’ financial resources
- Excellent- 17.6% Very good- 47.1% Good- 27.5% (92.2%)
* Using in-kind resources
- Excellent- 20.8% Very good- 47.2% Good- 26.4% (94.4%)
* Using partners’ time
- Excellent- 17.0% Very good- 49.1% Good- 26.4% (92.5%)
Evaluation ResultsAdministration and Management:
* Coordinating communication among partners
- Excellent- 30.4% Very good- 39.3% Good- 26.8% (96.5%)
* Coordinating communication outside Partnership
- Excellent- 16.4% Very good- 30.9% Good- 23.6% (70.9%)
* Organizing Partnership activities (meetings and projects)
- Excellent- 29.1% Very good- 49.1% Good- 18.2% (96.4%)
* Applying for and managing grants and funds
- Excellent- 18.2% Very good- 23.6% Good- 27.3% (69.1%) 25.5% Don’t know
* Preparing materials that inform partners
- Excellent- 23.2% Very good- 46.4% Good- 12.5% (82.1%)
Evaluation ResultsAdministration and Management:
* Effectiveness of Partnership in: secretarial duties
- Excellent- 27.8% Very good- 40.7% Good- 18.5% (87.0%)
* Providing orientation to new partners
- Excellent- 3.6% Very good- 21.8% Good- 20.0% (45.4%)
* Evaluating progress and impact
- Excellent- 9.1% Very good- 27.3% Good- 32.7% (69.1%)
* Minimizing barriers to participation
- Excellent- 16.4% Very good- 38.2% Good- 21.8% (76.4%)
Evaluation ResultsNon-Financial Resources:
Partnership has what it needs to work effectively* Skills and expertise
- All- 5.5% Most- 65.5% Some- 21.8% (92.8%)
* Data and information
- All- 3.6% Most- 47.3% Some- 41.8% (92.7%)
* Connections to target population
- All- 1.8% Most- 32.7% Some- 52.7% (87.2%)
Evaluation ResultsNon-Financial Resources:
Partnership has what it needs to work effectively* Connections to political decision makers, government
agencies and other groups
- All- 9.1% Most- 49.1% Some- 36.4% (94.6%)
* Legitimacy and credibility
- All- 16.4% Most- 56.4% Some- 25.5% (98.3%)
* Influence and ability to bring people together
- All- 5.5% Most- 69.1% Some- 23.6% (98.2%)
Evaluation ResultsFinancial and Other Capital Resources:
Partnership has what it needs to work effectively:
* Money
- All- 0% Most- 12.7% Some- 43.6% Almost none- 20.0% (76.3%)
* Space
- All- 9.1% Most- 49.1% Some- 21.8% Almost none- 1.8% (81.8%)
* Equipment and goods
- All- 3.6% Most- 43.6% Some- 29.1% Almost none- 3.6% (79.9%)
Evaluation ResultsDecision Making:
* How comfortable are you with decisions made?
- Extremely- 18.2% Very- 52.7% Somewhat- 21.8% (92.7%)
* How often do you support decisions made?
- All- 20.0% Most- 63.6% Somewhat- 16.4% (100%)
* How often do you feel left out?
- All- 0% Most- 7.4% Some- 24.1% Almost none- 42.6%
None- 25.9% (100%)
Evaluation ResultsBenefits of Participation:
Benefits from participating in KCP
* Enhanced ability to address important issues
Yes- 85.5% No- 14.5%
* Development of new skills
Yes- 73.2% No- 26.8%
* Heightened public profile
Yes- 53.6% No- 46.4%
Evaluation ResultsBenefits of Participation:
Benefits from participating in KCP
* Increased utilization of my expertise or services
Yes- 71.4% No- 28.6%
* Acquisition of useful knowledge about services,
programs and people
Yes- 87.5% No- 12.5%
* Enhanced ability to affect public policy
Yes- 75.0% No- 25.0%
Evaluation ResultsBenefits of Participation:
Benefits from participating in KCP
* Development of valuable relationships
Yes- 91.1% No- 8.9%
* Enhanced ability to meet needs of my clients
Yes- 67.9% No- 32.1%
* Greater impact than I can have on my own
Yes- 91.1% No- 8.9%
* Contribution to my community
Yes- 92.9% No- 7.1%
* Acquisition of additional financial support
Yes- 16.4% No- 83.6%
Evaluation ResultsDrawbacks of Participation:
Drawbacks from participating in KCP
* Diversion of time and resources away from your other obligations
Yes- 44.6% No- 55.4%
* Insufficient influence in partnership activities
Yes- 20.0% No- 80.0%
* Viewed negatively due to association with other partners
Yes- 7.3%
No- 92.7%
* Frustration or aggravation
Yes- 19.6% No- 80.4%
* Insufficient credit given to me for my contributions
Yes- 5.4%
No- 94.6%
* Conflict between my job and partnership’s work
Yes- 10.7% No- 89.3%
Evaluation ResultsComparing Benefits with Drawbacks:
* Benefits exceed drawbacks
Greatly exceed- 37.5% Exceed- 46.4% About equal- 16.1%
Satisfaction with Participation:
* How people work together
Completely satisfied- 27.8% Mostly satisfied- 59.3% Somewhat- 11.1%
* Your influence on Partnership
Completely satisfied- 25.5% Mostly satisfied- 45.5% Somewhat- 16.4%
* Your role in the Partnership
Completely satisfied- 29.1% Mostly satisfied- 32.7% Somewhat- 25.5%
* Partnership’s plan to achieve goals
Completely satisfied- 17.0% Mostly satisfied- 49.1% Somewhat- 28.3%
* Partnership’s plan to implement Plan
Completely satisfied- 12.7% Mostly satisfied- 60.0% Somewhat- 23.6%
KCP Evaluation Next Steps:
• Remember- YOU make the KCP a
success!!
• Research and Data group will discuss
results and action items
• Report results to CDC on bi-yearly
progress report
• Plan to repeat survey in 2011
Descargar

Kansas Comprehensive Cancer Control and Prevention Plan