Analyzing Regression Test Selection Techniques -presented by Xuan Lin Outline Introduction Concepts and Assumptions Analysis Framework Examples Techniques Conculsion and Discussion Outline Introduction Concepts and Assumptions Analysis Framework Examples Techniques Conculsion and Discussion Introduction What is Regression Testing? -Everybody knows … Retest-all strategy VS. Test Selection Notions: P,P’,S,S’,T,T’, Typical Selective Retest Process 1. Select T'≤T, a set of tests to execute on P' Regression Test Selection Problem 2.Test P’ with T’, to establish the correctness of P’ with respect to T’ Test Suite Execution Problem 3.If necessary, create T’’, a set of new functional or structural tests for P’ Coverage Identification Problem 4.Test P’ with T’’, to establish the correctness of P’ with respect to T’’ Test Suite Execution Problem 5.Create T’’’, a new test suite and test history for P’, from T, T’ and T’’ Test Suite Maintenance Typical Selective Retest Process 1. Select T'≤T, a set of tests to execute on P' Regression Test Selection Problem 2.Test P’ with T’, to establish the correctness of P’ with respect to T’ Test Suite Execution Problem 3.If necessary, create T’’, a set of new functional or structural tests for P’ Coverage Identification Problem 4.Test P’ with T’’, to establish the correctness of P’ with respect to T’’ Test Suite Execution Problem 5.Create T’’’, a new test suite and test history for P’, from T, T’ and T’’ Test Suite Maintenance Test Selection Techniques Specification-based VS. Code-based Three distinct goals of code-based test selection techniques -Coverage Techniques -Minimization Techniques -Safe Techniques Compare and Evaluation !!! Outline Introduction Concepts and Assumptions Analysis Framework Examples Techniques Conculsion and Discussion Concepts and Assumptions Fault-realing for P’: cause P’ to fail -No Effective procedure by which to find tests in T that are fault-realing for P’ [1] -Under certain conditions, a technique can select a Superset of the set of fault-revealing for P Modification-revealing: casue the outputs of P and P’ to differ. Concepts and Assumptions Modification-revealing = Fault-revealing ??? P-Correct-for-T Assumption: For each test t in T, when P was tested with t, P halted and produced the correct output Obsolet-Test-Identification Assumption: There is an effective procedure for determining, for each test in t, whether t is obsolete for P’. Test t is obsolete for P’ if and only if t either specifies an input to P’ that, according to S’, is invalid for P’, or t specifies an invalid input-output relation for P’ Concepts and Assumptions Up to now, we can find the fault-revealing test cases by: 1. Run our procedure for identifying obsolete test in T. 2. Remove them. 3. Find the modification-revealing test cases. - In the set of non-obsolete test cases, modificationrevealing=fault-revealing Concepts and Assumptions Obsolete Fault-Revealing Nonbsolete Fault-Revealing Modification-Revealing ??? Running P’ with inputs, and setting a time bound b such that, if any test exceeds the bound, we assume it is faultrevealing. Concepts and Assumptions Modification-traversing: a test t is modification-traversing for P and P’ if and only if it (a) executes new or modified code in P’, or (b) formerly executed code that has since been deleted Concepts and Assumptions Obsolete Fault-Revealing Nonbsolete Fault-Revealing Modification-Revealing ??? Modification-Traversing Concepts and Assumptions Controlled Regression Testing Assumption: when P’ is tested with t, we hold all factors that might infuence the output of P’, except for the code in P’, constant with respect to their states when we tested P with t. Why We Need Define These Concepts and Assumptions? Evaluate test selection techniques in terms of their ablities to select and avoid discarding fault-revealing tests. Three classes can be used to distinguish techniques even CRTA is not satisfied. Coverage techniques may omit tests from T’ that may reveal faults in P’ Outline Introduction Concepts and Assumptions Analysis Framework Examples Techniques Conculsion and Discussion Analysis Framework Incusiveness Precision Efficiency Generality Analysis FrameworkInclusiveness Analysis FrameworkInclusiveness There is no algorithm to determine the inclusiveness! However… We can prove M is safe. We can prove M is not safe. We can compare techinques in terms of inclusiveness We can experiment to approximate Analysis Framework-Precision Analysis Framework-Precision There is no algorithm to determine the precision! However… We can compare techinques in terms of precision. We can prove M is not precise We can show M is precise. We can experiment to compare. Analysis Framework-Efficiency Time & Space Cost of selecting T’ < the cost of running TT’ Three Factors 1.preliminary phase vs. critical phase 2.automatability 3. calculation informatin on program modifications 4.ability to handle multiple modifications Analysis FrameworkGenerality Should function for some identifiable and practical class of program Should handle realistic program modifications Should be independent of assumptions about testing or maintenance enviroments. Should be independent of particular program analysis tools Should support intraprocedural or interprocedural test selection Analysis Framework-Tradeoffs Precision vs. Efficiency - both safe and unsafe Inclusiveness vs.Efficiency -not safe Generality vs. Inclusiveness, Efficiency or Precision Multiple modication vs. Efficiency Outline Introduction Concepts and Assumptions Analysis Framework Examples Techniques Conculsion and Discussion Refresh… Obsolete Fault-Revealing Nonbsolete Fault-Revealing Modification-Revealing Modification-Traversing Depiction of inclusiveness and precision Retest-all Optimum Examples: Dataflow Caculate d-u pairs for both P and P’ Identify and select d-u pairs that are new in, or modified for P’ Some techniques also select deleted d-u pairs Incremental / Nonincremental Examples: Dataflow-Inclusion Not safe Examples: Dataflow-Precision Not precise Examples: Dataflow Examples: Dataflow-Effiency IncrementalO(|T|*|P’|*|P’|) Nonincremental- Examples: Dataflow-Generity Applied to procedural programs generally. Function for all program changes except those that do not alter d-u association Some techiques applied to intraprocedural programs while others applied to interprocedural programs Incremental approach requires incremental dataflow analysis tools. Examples: Graph Walk Techniques Build CFG for P and P’ Collects traces for tests with CFG edges. Performs synchronous depth-first traversals of the two graphs, selects those are not lexically identical. Examples: Graph Walk Techniques-Inclusiveness [1] shows that for controlled regression testing, the techniques will select all modification-traversing test. So, it is safe. Examples: Graph Walk Techniques-Precision Not precise Multiply-visisted-node Examples: Graph Walk Techniques In practice Improved version Examples: Graph Walk Techniques-Efficiency Generally: Property not hold[1]: Examples: Graph Walk Techniques-Generality Apply to procedural languages generally All type of modifications Both interprocedure and intraprocedure No assumption on test suite or coverage Require tools for constructing dataflow and tools for dataflow analysis Examples: Path Analysis Takes set of program paths in P’ expressed as an algebraic expression Manipulates the expression to get a set of cycle-free exemplar paths. Compare such paths in P with P’ Tests that traverse modified exemplar paths will be selected Examples: Path AnalysisInclusiveness Selects only modified paths and omits the cancel and new paths. Not safe. Examples: Path AnalysisPrecision It will select all the test cases that are modification-traversing and execute modified exemplar paths. Examples: Path Analysis Examples: Path AnalysisEfficiency Exponential in |P| and |P’| Examples: Path AnalysisGenerality Assumption: low-level program designs are depicted by language-independent algebraic representations. Does not handle test cases for additions or deletings of code. Does not require any coverage criterian or test generation technique. Require tool for collecting traces at the statement level. Conclusions Framework for evaluating regression test selection technique that classifies techniques in terms of inclusiveness, precision, efficiency, and generality. Several test selection techiques are evaluated Reference [1]G.Rotherel. Efficient, Effective Regression Testing Using Safe TestSelection Techniques.

Descargar
# Analyzing Regression Test Selection Techniques